Thursday, July 10, 2008
thoughts while studying....
we have to move past first world, developing world, and third world groupings which base a nation's worth on simple economic terms. how this relates to global health and terminology in general is that we have to start examining countries/people for what they can bring to the table, what they can offer us, what is their strengths and qualities versus just seeing how WE can help THEM. we're all in this together. the more we group and differentiate, the further someone's humanity is from us.
facts/articles about health care in India
got all these facts/numbers from one email from the global health council. felt compelled to share.
- A study among young brides in the northern Uttar Pradesh state found that 71 percent knew nothing about how sex happens and 83 percent did not know about pregnancy (http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/DEL283214.htm)
- The number of people using condoms, while having casual sex, is only 3.4% in Bihar. The percentage is highest at 69.3% in Punjab. Only 24% women in Delhi use condoms for family planning, while the national figure is a mere 6%, says the National Family Health Survey. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi/2000_condom_machines_for_city/articleshow/3173941.cms)
- This means that of the 54 lakh pregnant women in UP, more than 38 lakh deliver babies in unhealthy conditions...The third 'National Family Health Survey' shows that a whopping 74.7% of pregnant women never made three mandatory ante-natal care visits for their last birth. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Lucknow/Maternal_health_services_lacking_in_UP/articleshow/3186345.cms)
- A study among young brides in the northern Uttar Pradesh state found that 71 percent knew nothing about how sex happens and 83 percent did not know about pregnancy (http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/DEL283214.htm)
- The number of people using condoms, while having casual sex, is only 3.4% in Bihar. The percentage is highest at 69.3% in Punjab. Only 24% women in Delhi use condoms for family planning, while the national figure is a mere 6%, says the National Family Health Survey. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi/2000_condom_machines_for_city/articleshow/3173941.cms)
- This means that of the 54 lakh pregnant women in UP, more than 38 lakh deliver babies in unhealthy conditions...The third 'National Family Health Survey' shows that a whopping 74.7% of pregnant women never made three mandatory ante-natal care visits for their last birth. (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Lucknow/Maternal_health_services_lacking_in_UP/articleshow/3186345.cms)
Sunday, June 1, 2008
quotes by adnan...no. 1
"metaphors work so well because this world is built on such limited principles"
Dunkin' Donuts Boycott
I'm not one to boycott, and to jump on conspiracy theories because someone's uncle knew someone who donated money to Israel who happened to work for Starbucks, but this story is something that it utterly racist and that we should act on. Essentially, Dunkin Donuts pulled an ad featuring Rachel Ray wearing a kifaayah because people may think she has terrorist sympathies. It makes no sense, I know.
Here is an article on it - http://www.huffingtonpost.com
Here is a letter to sign on to send to Dunkin Donuts - http://answer.pephost.org/site
So lay off the munchkins for now if you can.
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
Putting AIDS in Perspective
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/01/opinion/edhalperin.php?page=1
this article focuses on something that i have thought for quite some time, but had not seen enough from the leaders of global health addressing. too much money is being spent on expensive drugs, centers, and outreach for diseases that affect a small amount of the population instead of focusing on the basic needs of people such as water and shelter which affects the majority of the population in many cases. maybe it's because these issues aren't sexy enough to fight and hard to convince the public of. maybe there is some hidden pharma campaign. but it makes no logical sense to not help communities with clean water but to give them the third line treatment for multidrug resistant tb. this falls in line with a principle of life that can be applied in many situations - if one does not have the basics (whether knowledge, physiological needs, or a skill in a sport), why or even how can one focus on some distant branch or fruit (doing a crossover before learning how to dribble, learning about diseases before learning normal physiology, or playing hendrix before learning the basic chords)?
another aside: do people feel better to "fight" a disease? to have a "war" against malaria or something? does having an "enemy" help people feel they are doing something and make them more likely to want to conquer it? providing clean water or a sewer system is a lot more boring and it works with people to help build something up. which is kind of why we value the surgeons and specialists of this country but do not care much for those providing primary care and preventative care to the millions of this country. this thinking has seeped into our psyche when you think about it. we like the exciting cases, the weird diseases, the grey's anatomy situation. this value is reflective in the reimbursement and salaries of our doctors. we value the surgeon who cuts into our body to remove a tumor, but not the doctor that never let us smoke because it would lead to cancer, plus a host of other problems.
i know i started to rant towards the end, but i think it's all interrelated. what does this mean for where we are heading? a good amount of this thinking is specific to americans, especially those related to health since we are one of the only nations without a form of socialized medicine. we need to make the boring meaningful and valued.
even in a religious sense. going to church, praying namaz, keeping a fast is all seen as the mundane and easy to forget. but it's the home run, the grand slam that people love and adore and look forward to. the hajj, the visit to jerusalem, meeting the pope, going to rishikesh.
my point in all this is not to knock the high points of thought, accomplishment, or experience, but to remind us all that we must work on the foundations and respect it before moving forward.
this article focuses on something that i have thought for quite some time, but had not seen enough from the leaders of global health addressing. too much money is being spent on expensive drugs, centers, and outreach for diseases that affect a small amount of the population instead of focusing on the basic needs of people such as water and shelter which affects the majority of the population in many cases. maybe it's because these issues aren't sexy enough to fight and hard to convince the public of. maybe there is some hidden pharma campaign. but it makes no logical sense to not help communities with clean water but to give them the third line treatment for multidrug resistant tb. this falls in line with a principle of life that can be applied in many situations - if one does not have the basics (whether knowledge, physiological needs, or a skill in a sport), why or even how can one focus on some distant branch or fruit (doing a crossover before learning how to dribble, learning about diseases before learning normal physiology, or playing hendrix before learning the basic chords)?
another aside: do people feel better to "fight" a disease? to have a "war" against malaria or something? does having an "enemy" help people feel they are doing something and make them more likely to want to conquer it? providing clean water or a sewer system is a lot more boring and it works with people to help build something up. which is kind of why we value the surgeons and specialists of this country but do not care much for those providing primary care and preventative care to the millions of this country. this thinking has seeped into our psyche when you think about it. we like the exciting cases, the weird diseases, the grey's anatomy situation. this value is reflective in the reimbursement and salaries of our doctors. we value the surgeon who cuts into our body to remove a tumor, but not the doctor that never let us smoke because it would lead to cancer, plus a host of other problems.
i know i started to rant towards the end, but i think it's all interrelated. what does this mean for where we are heading? a good amount of this thinking is specific to americans, especially those related to health since we are one of the only nations without a form of socialized medicine. we need to make the boring meaningful and valued.
even in a religious sense. going to church, praying namaz, keeping a fast is all seen as the mundane and easy to forget. but it's the home run, the grand slam that people love and adore and look forward to. the hajj, the visit to jerusalem, meeting the pope, going to rishikesh.
my point in all this is not to knock the high points of thought, accomplishment, or experience, but to remind us all that we must work on the foundations and respect it before moving forward.
Monday, December 3, 2007
Thursday, November 29, 2007
winamp meditation
i think my winamp software says a lot about me, as far as the way i think of life sometimes...which i am not happy about...so you have two options on winamp, either 1) see how much time is remaining in the song or 2) see how much time has elapsed. i usually keep the former option. to me, this says instead of enjoying the moment and where it's going, i'm anticipating when this moment will be over, therefore stressing myself out to a certain extent, looking ahead instead of living in the moment. i need to focus more on the here and now, enjoying what's before me. not only is it better mentally for me, it allows me to perform and act more effectively with more zeal and enjoyment....or maybe i should just use itunes...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
