A death in the family can be an explicit reminder of what it means to lose someone, but many deaths take place that aren't so directly related to you. We see it in different forms, but the media's portrayal of death perplexes me. Anytime you pick up a newspaper, you're bound to see headlines like these - "40 insurgents killed in Afghanistan", "3 killed by suicide bomber", "Hundreds die in landslide". One sees death in many forms - a friend, on the news, in the hospital - but the effect each elicits is different. Should it be this way? Should we be that jaded and sensitized to it that we can calmly read it in the paper? Do we consider what these lives mean? Is it necessary to consider this and and to do so regularly for our own sake? I don't know the answers, but it does make you think.For killing insurgents and other "bad guys", I think of how each of them must have their own life story. They might have been at the "insurgent house" at the wrong time. They might have been going to a meeting just to check out what this talk was about. They might not be "insurgents" at all, but because someone thought they were up to no good, their lives ended and it probably affected a lot of other people around them. I am not against dealing with those who have done wrong and/or have engaged in terrorist activities, but the brute manner in which it is done, and then translated into a headline is dehumanizing.
With a suicide bomber, it drives me crazy to think of the innocents involved. Not that all "insurgents" are necessarily guilty, but this operation usually involves kids, elders, man, woman - it kills indiscriminately. As readers of these stories, we are left with the event and no connection to the effect of these besides the political ramifications. Death may be treated as a necessary consequence.
Natural disasters are another form. These usually have high numbers, making the event even more "newsworthy". It helps our minds conceptualize these numbers by equating them to the size of our schools or towns, but once again, we are so far from the event, it is tough for us to conceive of what's happening on the ground. Out of all news stories, however, I think these events usually do the best job of attempting to connect us to the humanity involved since there is usually no ulterior motive to discuss. I think we all feel more connected to the deceased during these tragedies since we know that a natural disaster is something we may all face.
My last point is statistics. Statistics are frequently used as a tactic to impress/scare and raise money or awareness. For example,"every 3.6 seconds another person dies of starvation and the large majority are children under the age of 5." The shock value is immense and a sort of guilt settles inside of me. These are the hardest to fathom for me because you can't necessarily attach a face to these, or even a location, but it's happening as you type, somewhere in the world. Your mind searches for who these people are and how varied their stories may be.
I read the news often, so I'm hoping that seeing headlines involving "death" and "kills" will not push me to the point of being jaded as to not realize what death entails. Death is one the cruelest aspects of this world, but it undoubtedly connects all of us. It can serve as a great reminder to what this life means, and instead of waiting for it to affect you more directly, we can use the media's portrayal as daily reminder. Just as important, I will try to make sure not to lose the human in the headline. Every being has a story, some family, or an environment that they are affecting. May every dead soul rest in peace.
interesting link related to death and life around the world - http://www.breathingearth.net/

